Restituire la mano al pensiero. Per una ecologia cognitiva della scrittura nella scuola contemporanea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4454/graphos.147Parole chiave:
handwriting, phenomenology, embodied cognition, neuromotor warm-up, inclusive education.Abstract
Riconfigurare la didattica della scrittura a mano, intesa come pratica cognitiva incarnata e warm-up neuromotorio, consente di superare il dilemma tra analogico e digitale. Entro una cornice che intreccia il pensare heideggeriano come ascolto e dimora nel linguaggio con una prospettiva semiotica e una fenomenologia del gesto, la scrittura manuale si rivela luogo in cui segno, corpo e mondo si co-costituiscono. Su queste basi viene proposto un modello pedagogico-operativo integrato per l’educazione alla lettura e alla scrittura nella scuola contemporanea: un impianto ecologico in tre fasi, sincronia neuromotoria, trascrizione intenzionale e scrittura per comprendere che orchestra le affordance complementari della mano, della penna digitale con feedback aptico e della tastiera. Le evidenze convergono: l’alfabeto si consolida congiuntamente come codice e programma motorio; variabilità del tratto stabilizza le rappresentazioni ortografiche; la produzione manuale attiva pattern di sincronizzazione più ricchi della digitazione e sostiene fluenza, decodifica e comprensione. Restituire la mano al pensiero emerge come scelta metodoogica consapevole al servizio di un sapere abitabile e condiviso.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Bartoň, M., Fňašková, M., Rektorová, I., Mikl, M., Mareček, R., Rapcsak, S. Z., & Rektor, I. (2020). The role of the striatum in visuomotor integration during handwriting: an fMRI study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 127(3), 331-337.
Berninger, V. W., Richards, T. L., & Abbott, R. D. (2015). Differential diagnosis of dysgraphia, dyslexia, and OWL LD: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1119-1153.
Bonneton-Botté, N., Miramand, L., Bailly, R., & Pons, C. (2023). Teaching and rehabilitation of handwriting for children in the digital age: Issues and challenges. Children, 10(7), 1096.
Doug, R. (2019). Handwriting: Developing Pupils' Identity and Cognitive Skills. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(2), 177-188.
Everaert-Desmedt, N. (2019). Peirce’s semiotics. In An Introduction to Applied Semiotics (pp. 241-249). Routledge.
Eco, U. (1979). A theory of semiotics (Vol. 217). Indiana University Press.
Gallagher, S. (2006). How the body shapes the mind. Clarendon press.
Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology press.
Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge University Press.
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Heidegger, M. (1952). Was heisst Denken?. Merkur, 6(53), 601-611.
James, K. H. (2017). The importance of handwriting experience on the development of the literate brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 502–508.
James, K. H., & Engelhardt, L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in preliterate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 1(1), 32–42.
Longcamp, M., Velay, J. L., Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. (2016). Neuroanatomy of handwriting and related reading and writing skills in adults and children with and without learning disabilities: French-American connections. Pratiques. Linguistique, littérature, didactique, (171-172).
Lopez-Escribano, C., Martin-Babarro, J., & Perez-Lopez, R. (2022). Promoting handwriting fluency for preschool and elementary-age students: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis of research from 2000 to 2020. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 841573.
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., ... & Mazza, M. (2025). The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing Who Wins the Battle?. Life, 15(3), 345.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard.
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science, 25(6), 1159-1168.
Rønningsbakk, L. (2022, August). How does the shift from handwriting to digital writing technologies impact writing for learning in school?. In International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning (pp. 231-240). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Stiglic, N., & Viner, R. M. (2019). Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ open, 9(1), e023191.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2024). La mente nel corpo. Astrolabio.
Van der Weel, F. R., & Van der Meer, A. L. (2024). Handwriting but not typewriting leads to widespread brain connectivity: a high-density EEG study with implications for the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1219945.
Wiley, R. W., & Rapp, B. (2021). The effects of handwriting experience on literacy learning. Psychological science, 32(7), 1086-1103.
World Health Organization. (2020). Guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World Health Organization.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 CLAUDIA CAPACI

TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Edizioni ETS s.r.l. LUNGARNO MEDICEO 16 - 56127 - PISA