Writing with the hands, thinking with the body

Craft and Making Practice as a foundation for a pedagogy of creativity in writing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4454/graphos.169

Keywords:

Craft and Making Practice, pedagogy of creativity, handwriting, graphic-expressive gesture, eudaimonic well-being

Abstract

This paper proposes an unprecedented dialogue between two pedagogical traditions developed in parallel without systematic encounter: the Italian tradition of creativity — from Munari to Rodari to Malaguzzi — and the Nordic tradition of Craft and Making Practice (CMaP). Through an inter- and trans-disciplinary approach integrating pedagogy of creativity, cognitive neuropsychology, and educational sciences, the paper shows how CMaP — with Pöllänen's holistic craft, the materiality of gesture theorized by Ingold, Sennett, and Malafouris, and the narrative meanings documented by Kouhia — provides the epistemological foundations and pedagogical models that the Italian tradition had intuited without systematizing. Handwriting is reread in its dual graphic-expressive and narrative dimensions as a craft practice generative of identity and eudaimonic well-being, relevant across the lifespan and particularly at different evolutionary phases of schooling. Neuropsychological research (Longcamp et al., 2008; Van der Meer & Van der Weel, 2017; Mueller & Oppenheimer, 2014) confirms the irreducibility of handwriting as embodied cognition. Implications concern didactic design, assessment of creative processes, and the formation of teachers capable of inhabiting their writing practice as reflective practitioners.

References

Benelli C., Broglia L. (2024). Tenere traccia, riflettere, progettare. Il diario di bordo nell'agire educativo. Lifelong Lifewide Learning, vol. 22, n. 45, pp. 96-105.

Borg K. (2001). Slöjdämnet: intryck, uttryck, avtryck. Linköping: Linköpings Universitet.

Calkins L. (1994). The Art of Teaching Writing. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

Csikszentmihalyi M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: HarperCollins.

Dewey J. (1910). How We Think. Boston: D.C. Heath & Co.

Dewey J. (1934). Art as Experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Co.

Edwards C., Gandini L., Forman G. (a cura di) (1993). The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Approach to Early Childhood Education. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

Guilford J.P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, vol. 14, n. 8, pp. 469-479.

Halverson E.R., Sheridan K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, n. 4, pp. 495-504.

Ingold T. (2007). Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.

Ingold T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.

James K.H., Engelhardt L. (2012). The effects of handwriting experience on functional brain development in pre-literate children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 32-42.

Johansson M. (2006). Slöjdpraktik i skolan: hand, tanke, kommunikation och andra medierande redskap. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

Kaufman J.C., Beghetto R.A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, vol. 13, n. 1, pp. 1-12.

Kokko, S., & Räisänen, R. (2019). Craft education in sustaining and developing craft traditions: Reflections from Finnish craft teacher education. Techne serien-Forskning i slöjdpedagogik och slöjdvetenskap, 26(1), 27-43.

Kouhia A. (2012). Unraveling the meanings of textile hobby crafts. Textile: The Journal of Cloth and Culture, vol. 10, n. 3, pp. 280-299.

Kouhia, A. (2015). Crafting the collective sense: A descriptive case study on recreational textile craft-making in Finnish adult education. International Journal of Education Through Art, 11(1), 7-20.

Lindström L. (2006). Creativity: What is it? Can you assess it? Can it be taught? International Journal of Art & Design Education, vol. 25, n. 1, pp. 53-66.

Longcamp M., Boucard C., Gilhodes J.C., Anton J.L., Roth M., Nazarian B., Velay J.L. (2008). Learning through hand- or typewriting influences visual recognition of new graphic shapes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 20, n. 5, pp. 802-815.

Malafouris L. (2013). How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (2018). Indicazioni nazionali e nuovi scenari. https://www.mim.gov.it

Ministero dell'Istruzione e del Merito (2025). Nuove Indicazioni. Scuola dell'infanzia e primo ciclo di istruzione. https://www.mim.gov.it

Mortari L. (2024). Apprendere dall'esperienza. Il pensare riflessivo nella formazione. Roma: Carocci.

Mueller P.A., Oppenheimer D.M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, vol. 25, n. 6, pp. 1159-1168.

Munari B. (1974). Proposta di una scuola di design che comincia dall'asilo. Domus, n. 538, pp. 52-54.

Munari B. (1977). Fantasia. Invenzione, creatività e immaginazione nelle comunicazioni visive. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Murray, D. M. (1981). Making meaning clear: The logic of revision. Journal of Basic Writing, 3(3), 33-40.

Pöllänen S. (2009). Contextualising craft: Pedagogical models for craft education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, vol. 28, n. 3, pp. 249-260.

Pöllänen, S. (2015). Elements of crafts that enhance well-being: Textile craft makers' descriptions of their leisure activity. Journal of leisure research, 47(1), 58-78.

Pöllänen, S. H., & Weissmann-Hanski, M. K. (2020). Hand-made well-being: Textile crafts as a source of eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(3), 348-365.

Ricoeur P. (1992). Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rodari, G. (2021). Gramática da fantasia: uma introdução à arte de inventar histórias. Summus Editorial.

Salomon, O. A. (1911). The Theory of Educational Sloyd: The Only Authorised Edition of Lectures of Otto Salomon. Silver, Burdett & Company.

Schön D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

Sennett R. (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Torrance E.P. (1966). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Princeton: Personnel Press.

Van der Meer A.L.H., Van der Weel F.R. (2017). Only three fingers write, but the whole brain works: A high-density EEG study showing advantages of drawing over typing for learning. Frontiers in Psychology, n. 8, p. 706.

Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Published

2026-10-05

How to Cite

Sgorla, A. F. (2026). Writing with the hands, thinking with the body: Craft and Making Practice as a foundation for a pedagogy of creativity in writing. Graphos. International Journal of Paedagogy and Didactics of Writing, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.4454/graphos.169

Issue

Section

Essays