The evaluation grids of the first test of the State Examination: open issues

Authors

  • Letizia Ferri Università dell'Insubria
  • Eliana DeCaro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4454/graphos.61

Keywords:

Writing Instruction, State Examination, Docimology, Outstanding Challenges, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

After a brief introduction on the docimological difficulties related to the first test of the State Examination and its evolution, an overview of the evaluation grids used in recent years at the L. Einaudi Professional Institute of Varese is presented, as an example of what happens on the national territory. In the absence of a ministerial evaluative instrument, each school, annually, creates or selects, among innumerable models, its own evaluative grid: this practice leads to reflecting on the validity of these devices, their strengths and weaknesses, and the effects on the teaching of writing.

The lack of evaluative uniformity and consequent lack of homogeneous and functional practices in the teaching of writing open up multiple problems, especially in the current context. Some of the most urgent open issues will be set out in this paper, followed by an attempt to propose the debate and formative assessment as alternative to the grids. The conclusions focus on the importance for teachers to improve the teaching and assessment of writing in view of the State Examination.

References

Benvenuto, G. (2003), Mettere i voti a scuola. Introduzione alla docimologia, Roma: Carocci, pp. 29-39.

Benvenuto, G. (2007), Gli esami sono maturi? Critiche e prospettive docimologiche per gli esami di stato, Roma: Anicia , pp. 45-48.

Bereiter K., Scardamalia M. (1995), Psicologia della produzione scritta, Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Boscolo P. (2002), La scrittura nella scuola dell’obbligo, Roma: Laterza.

Corno D. (2000), Scrivere, pensare, sapere di sapere. Aspetti e problemi del paradigma cognitivo nell’insegnare a scrivere, in Camponovo F., Moretti A. (a cura di), Didattica ed educazione linguistica, La Nuova Italia, Firenze, pp. 97-124.

Cortiana P., Scardino R., Zorzi E., (2022), Imparare le abilità di revisione attraverso l’apprendistato cognitivo: una proposta didattica in ottica collaborativa, in Formazione e Insegnamento XX-1-2022.

Greenstein, L. (2017), La valutazione formativa, Torino: UTET.

Guerriero, A. R. (2019), Quadri teorici, pratiche didattiche e tipi di protocolli delle prove di scrittura, in Italiano LinguaDue, n.1, pp. 166-176.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Piéron, H. (1963), Examens et docimologie, Paris:Presses Universitaires de France, 1963; tr. it. Esami e docimologia, Roma: Armando, 1965, pp. 9-13; Conclusioni pp. 183-184.

Yang C. (2002), Multidensional taxonomy of learners’ cognitive processing in discourse synthesis with hypermedia, in Computers in human behaviour, 18, 1, pp. 37-68.

Wolf M. (2018), Lettore vieni a casa. Il cervello che legge in un mondo digitale, Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

Published

2024-01-04

How to Cite

Ferri, L., & DeCaro, E. (2024). The evaluation grids of the first test of the State Examination: open issues. Graphos. International Journal of Paedagogy and Didactics of Writing, 4, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.4454/graphos.61

Issue

Section

Ongoing research