Educational postures in the sign of pausing: 間 Ma
How an ideogram can generate meaning openings for pedagogical reflection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4454/graphos.111Keywords:
embodiment, relationship, responsibility, awarenessAbstract
Technological changes are profoundly altering the field of education and training and the connection between technology and education could propose unprecedented changes. The contribution intends to bring reflections from the paradigm of embodiment in education, pointing out the irreplicable characteristic of the human: that of a living and breathing being (Casadei, 2023). Corporeality, heartbeat and breath represent the primary expression of being-ness, of life, of the energy that enables it and of the interconnectedness that characterises the dimension in the onlife form. Reflections start from the observation of the ideogram 間, which expresses its corporeal matrix due to the relational nature of its graphic composition and semantic extension, for the recomposition of concepts that are intelligible and expressible according to logics that break the linearity of reasoning and descriptive discourse, to open up to experiences of comprehension of a sensitive, intuitive and imaginative type. Reflection takes place from an experiential perspective of a corporeal and aesthetic nature in which discernment and sensitivity are joined by the unity of mind and body. Writing is a conscious bodily experience, a gesture of exploration and openness a pausing to encounter the silent word bearer of meaning.
References
Casadei R. (2012). L’educazione attraverso il gesto: forgiarsi come percorso di conoscenza, azione e sperimentazione di sé, in Travaglini R. I processi formativi dell’Aikido. Sguardi su dinamiche e potenzai-lità, Pisa: ETS.
Casadei R. (2023). Education: questions and dialogues (at) work, Pi-sa: ETS.
Cavana L., Casadei R. (2016), Pedagogia come direzione. Ricerca di senso tra dinamiche esistenziali e esigenze professionali, Roma: Aracne.
Damasio A. (2000). Emozione e coscienza, Roma: Adelphi
De Mauro T. (1980). Guida all’uso della parola, Roma: Editori Riu-niti.
Edelman G. (2007). Seconda natura. Scienza del cervello e conoscen-za umana, Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
Fodor J. (2001). Mente e linguaggio, Bari: Laterza.
Gallagher S. (1995). Body schema and intentionality, in Bermúdez J., Eilan N., Marcel A. J. (eds.), The Body and the Self (225-244). Ox-ford: Oxford University Press.
Galliano l. (2004). Ma. La sensibilità estetica giapponese, Torino: Angolo Manzoni.
Ghilardi M. (2012). Arte e pensiero in Giappone. Corpo, immagine, gesto. Milano: Mimesis.
Maraini F. (2007). Gli ideogrammi, in Marcoaldi F. (a cura di) (2018). Pellegrino in Asia. Opere scelte, Milano: Mondadori.
Morin E. (2015). Insegnare a vivere. Manifesto per cambiare l’educazione, Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
Raveri M. (2016). Il pensiero giapponese classico, Torino: Einaudi.
Seubold G. (2003). Il chiarore del nulla. Modi, forme e spirito dell’arte giapponese, Milano: Christian Marinotti Edizioni.
Shinohara K. (2022). L’eco nello spazio. Forme, metodi e logica nell’architettura giapponese, Milano: Christian Marinotti Edizioni.
Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E. (2024). La mente è nel corpo. Scienze cognitive ed esperienza umana, Roma: Ubaldini.
Wittgenstein L. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Id., Tractatus logico-philosophicus e Quaderni 1914-1916, Einaudi, Torino 1998.
Zlatev, J. (2007). Embodiment, language and mimesis, Lund Universi-ty.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rita Casadei
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.